Congo vs Malta: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Congo
0.0%
in 2012
Malta
0.0%
in 2017
Congo rank
68th
Malta rank
68th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Congo
  • Malta
00.20.40.60.81199920082017

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Malta, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 68th and Malta ranks 68th of 174 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Congo or Malta?
Congo, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Malta as of 2012.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Congo and Malta?
0.0%, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malta?
13 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
How do Congo and Malta rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Congo ranks 68th and Malta ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 2,961 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.