Cameroon vs Eritrea: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Cameroon
0.0%
in 2019
Eritrea
0.0%
in 2018
Cameroon rank
68th
Eritrea rank
68th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Cameroon
- Eritrea
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Eritrea, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Eritrea has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 68th and Eritrea ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 1.9% | 1.9% | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Cameroon or Eritrea?
- Cameroon, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Eritrea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Cameroon and Eritrea?
- 0.0%, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Eritrea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Cameroon and Eritrea rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Cameroon ranks 68th and Eritrea ranks 68th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.