Australia vs Uruguay: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Australia
40.1%
in 2018
Uruguay
39.4%
in 2018
Australia rank
20th
Uruguay rank
22nd
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Australia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Australia currently reports 40.1% against 39.4% in Uruguay, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Uruguay ahead.
Australia ranks 20th and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 174 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 34.5% | 32.3% | 2.2% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Australia or Uruguay?
- Australia, at 40.1% against 39.4% in Uruguay as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Australia and Uruguay?
- 0.7%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Uruguay?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Uruguay rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Australia ranks 20th and Uruguay ranks 22nd of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.