Australia vs Cayman Islands: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Australia
- Cayman Islands
How they compare
Cayman Islands currently reports 40.3% against 40.1% in Australia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cayman Islands ahead.
Australia ranks 20th and Cayman Islands ranks 18th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Cayman Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Cayman Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 30.5% | 30.5% | Cayman Islands |
| 2010s | 45.1% | 38.6% | 6.5% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Australia or Cayman Islands?
- Cayman Islands, at 40.3% against 40.1% in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Australia and Cayman Islands?
- 0.2%, with Cayman Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cayman Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Cayman Islands rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Australia ranks 20th and Cayman Islands ranks 18th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.