Rwanda vs East Timor: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Rwanda
0.6%
in 2019
East Timor
0.0%
in 2019
Rwanda rank
67th
East Timor rank
69th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Rwanda
- East Timor
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.6% against 0.0% in East Timor, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2009 it was East Timor ahead.
Rwanda ranks 67th and East Timor ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Rwanda or East Timor?
- Rwanda, at 0.6% against 0.0% in East Timor as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Rwanda and East Timor?
- 0.6%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and East Timor?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2019.
- How do Rwanda and East Timor rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Rwanda ranks 67th and East Timor ranks 69th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.