Rwanda vs Solomon Islands: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Rwanda
0.6%
in 2019
Solomon Islands
0.0%
in 2018
Rwanda rank
67th
Solomon Islands rank
69th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Rwanda
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.6% against 0.0% in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Rwanda ranks 67th and Solomon Islands ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Rwanda or Solomon Islands?
- Rwanda, at 0.6% against 0.0% in Solomon Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
- 0.6%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Solomon Islands?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Rwanda and Solomon Islands rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Rwanda ranks 67th and Solomon Islands ranks 69th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.