Poland vs Samoa: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Poland
0.0%
in 2018
Samoa
0.0%
in 2019
Poland rank
69th
Samoa rank
69th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Poland
  • Samoa
00.20.40.60.81199820082019

How they compare

Poland currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 69th and Samoa ranks 69th of 177 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Samoa Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Poland or Samoa?
Poland, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Samoa as of 2018.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Poland and Samoa?
0.0%, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Samoa?
15 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
How do Poland and Samoa rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Poland ranks 69th and Samoa ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
211 places, 3,062 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.