Monaco vs Tonga: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Monaco
0.0%
in 2020
Tonga
0.0%
in 2015
Monaco rank
69th
Tonga rank
69th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Monaco
  • Tonga
00.20.40.60.81199820092020

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tonga, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.

Monaco ranks 69th and Tonga ranks 69th of 177 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Monaco Tonga Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Monaco or Tonga?
Monaco, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tonga as of 2020.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Monaco and Tonga?
0.0%, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Tonga?
5 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2015.
How do Monaco and Tonga rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Monaco ranks 69th and Tonga ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
211 places, 3,062 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.