Madagascar vs Philippines: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Madagascar
0.0%
in 2019
Philippines
0.0%
in 2018
Madagascar rank
69th
Philippines rank
69th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Madagascar
- Philippines
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Philippines, a difference of 0.0%.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 69th and Philippines ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Madagascar or Philippines?
- Madagascar, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Philippines as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Madagascar and Philippines?
- 0.0%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Philippines?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Madagascar and Philippines rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Madagascar ranks 69th and Philippines ranks 69th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.