Low & middle income vs Namibia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Low & middle income
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 47.9% against 22.3% in Low & middle income, a difference of 25.6%.
That makes Namibia's figure about 2.1 times Low & middle income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Low & middle income ahead.
Low & middle income ranks 12th and Namibia ranks 14th of 33 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Low & middle income averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low & middle income | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.8% | 0.0% | 11.8% | Low & middle income |
| 2010s | 18.8% | 36.1% | 17.3% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Low & middle income or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 47.9% against 22.3% in Low & middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Low & middle income and Namibia?
- 25.6%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Namibia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Low & middle income and Namibia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Low & middle income ranks 12th and Namibia ranks 14th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.