Jamaica vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Jamaica
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 4.6% against 3.2% in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 1.4%.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.4 times Lao People's Democratic Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
Jamaica ranks 58th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 61st of 177 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Jamaica or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Jamaica, at 4.6% against 3.2% in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Jamaica and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 1.4%, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Jamaica and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Jamaica ranks 58th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 61st of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.