Israel vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Israel
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 68.2% against 61.7% in Israel, a difference of 6.5%.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 8th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 5th of 177 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 59.9% | 59.9% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 26.0% | 74.7% | 48.7% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Israel or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 68.2% against 61.7% in Israel as of 2016.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Israel and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 6.5%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2016.
- How do Israel and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Israel ranks 8th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 5th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.