Iceland vs Middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Iceland
- Middle income
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 48.1% against 23.4% in Middle income, a difference of 24.7%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 2.1 times Middle income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Middle income ahead.
Iceland ranks 13th and Middle income ranks 9th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Middle income in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 11.0% | 11.0% | Middle income |
| 2010s | 33.9% | 18.2% | 15.7% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Iceland or Middle income?
- Iceland, at 48.1% against 23.4% in Middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Iceland and Middle income?
- 24.7%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Middle income?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Iceland and Middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Iceland ranks 13th and Middle income ranks 9th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.