Iceland vs Low & middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Iceland
- Low & middle income
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 48.1% against 22.3% in Low & middle income, a difference of 25.8%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 2.2 times Low & middle income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Low & middle income ahead.
Iceland ranks 13th and Low & middle income ranks 12th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Low & middle income in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Low & middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 11.0% | 11.0% | Low & middle income |
| 2010s | 33.9% | 17.6% | 16.3% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Iceland or Low & middle income?
- Iceland, at 48.1% against 22.3% in Low & middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Iceland and Low & middle income?
- 25.8%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Low & middle income?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Iceland and Low & middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Iceland ranks 13th and Low & middle income ranks 12th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.