Iceland vs IDA blend: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Iceland
- IDA blend
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 48.1% against 22.7% in IDA blend, a difference of 25.4%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 2.1 times IDA blend's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was IDA blend ahead.
Iceland ranks 13th and IDA blend ranks 12th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and IDA blend in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | IDA blend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | IDA blend |
| 2010s | 29.1% | 11.3% | 17.9% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Iceland or IDA blend?
- Iceland, at 48.1% against 22.7% in IDA blend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Iceland and IDA blend?
- 25.4%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and IDA blend?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Iceland and IDA blend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Iceland ranks 13th and IDA blend ranks 12th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.