IBRD only vs Thailand: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

IBRD only
23.8%
in 2019
Thailand
53.9%
in 2019
IBRD only rank
9th
Thailand rank
12th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • IBRD only
  • Thailand
204060200720132019

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 53.9% against 23.8% in IBRD only, a difference of 30.1%.

That makes Thailand's figure about 2.3 times IBRD only's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 9th and Thailand ranks 12th of 34 groups.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, IBRD only or Thailand?
Thailand, at 53.9% against 23.8% in IBRD only as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between IBRD only and Thailand?
30.1%, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Thailand?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do IBRD only and Thailand rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
IBRD only ranks 9th and Thailand ranks 12th of 34 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
211 places, 3,062 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.