Finland vs Small states: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Finland
- Small states
How they compare
Finland currently reports 47.1% against 19.8% in Small states, a difference of 27.3%.
That makes Finland's figure about 2.4 times Small states's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Small states ahead.
Finland ranks 15th and Small states ranks 17th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Small states in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Small states | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 2.4% | 2.4% | Small states |
| 2010s | 28.5% | 13.3% | 15.2% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Finland or Small states?
- Finland, at 47.1% against 19.8% in Small states as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Finland and Small states?
- 27.3%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Small states?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Finland and Small states rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Finland ranks 15th and Small states ranks 17th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.