Finland vs IDA blend: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Finland
- IDA blend
How they compare
Finland currently reports 47.1% against 22.7% in IDA blend, a difference of 24.4%.
That makes Finland's figure about 2.1 times IDA blend's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was IDA blend ahead.
Finland ranks 15th and IDA blend ranks 11th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and IDA blend in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | IDA blend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.3% | IDA blend |
| 2010s | 23.6% | 9.9% | 13.7% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Finland or IDA blend?
- Finland, at 47.1% against 22.7% in IDA blend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Finland and IDA blend?
- 24.4%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and IDA blend?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Finland and IDA blend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Finland ranks 15th and IDA blend ranks 11th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.