Equatorial Guinea vs Mexico: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 3.3% against 2.5% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Equatorial Guinea's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 63rd and Mexico ranks 60th of 177 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 1.2% | 1.8% | 0.6% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Equatorial Guinea or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 3.3% against 2.5% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Equatorial Guinea and Mexico?
- 0.8%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Mexico?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2015.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Mexico rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 63rd and Mexico ranks 60th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.