El Salvador vs Kyrgyzstan: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- El Salvador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 7.3% against 6.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
El Salvador ranks 50th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 53rd of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 2.8% | 3.1% | 0.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, El Salvador or Kyrgyzstan?
- El Salvador, at 7.3% against 6.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do El Salvador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- El Salvador ranks 50th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 53rd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.