East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Norway: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 85.0% against 34.3% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 50.7%.
That makes Norway's figure about 2.5 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2012 it was East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 3rd and Norway ranks 3rd of 34 groups.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Norway?
- Norway, at 85.0% against 34.3% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Norway?
- 50.7%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Norway?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Norway rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 3rd and Norway ranks 3rd of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.