East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Sweden: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 71.4% against 34.1% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 37.3%.
That makes Sweden's figure about 2.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th and Sweden ranks 4th of 34 groups.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 71.4% against 34.1% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Sweden?
- 37.3%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2018.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Sweden rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th and Sweden ranks 4th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.