East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Korea: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Korea
How they compare
Korea currently reports 89.8% against 34.1% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 55.7%.
That makes Korea's figure about 2.6 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2012 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th and Korea ranks 2nd of 34 groups.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Korea?
- Korea, at 89.8% against 34.1% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Korea?
- 55.7%, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Korea?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2018.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Korea rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th and Korea ranks 2nd of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.