Cyprus vs Lithuania: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Cyprus
29.0%
in 2018
Lithuania
28.3%
in 2018
Cyprus rank
29th
Lithuania rank
30th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Cyprus
- Lithuania
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 29.0% against 28.3% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Lithuania ahead.
Cyprus ranks 29th and Lithuania ranks 30th of 177 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 13.0% | 13.0% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 14.1% | 14.1% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 16.7% | 23.4% | 6.7% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Cyprus or Lithuania?
- Cyprus, at 29.0% against 28.3% in Lithuania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Cyprus and Lithuania?
- 0.7%, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Lithuania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Cyprus and Lithuania rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Cyprus ranks 29th and Lithuania ranks 30th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.