Costa Rica vs Romania: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Costa Rica
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 3.9% against 3.2% in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 62nd and Romania ranks 59th of 177 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.5% | 0.0% | 1.5% | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 1.6% | 0.0% | 1.6% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 2.7% | 2.0% | 0.7% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Costa Rica or Romania?
- Romania, at 3.9% against 3.2% in Costa Rica as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Costa Rica and Romania?
- 0.7%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Romania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Costa Rica and Romania rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Costa Rica ranks 62nd and Romania ranks 59th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.