Congo vs Samoa: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Congo
0.0%
in 2012
Samoa
0.0%
in 2019
Congo rank
69th
Samoa rank
69th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Congo
  • Samoa
00.20.40.60.81199820082019

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 69th and Samoa ranks 69th of 177 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Samoa Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Congo or Samoa?
Congo, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Samoa as of 2012.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Congo and Samoa?
0.0%, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Samoa?
9 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
How do Congo and Samoa rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Congo ranks 69th and Samoa ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
211 places, 3,062 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.