British Virgin Islands vs IDA blend: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- British Virgin Islands
- IDA blend
How they compare
British Virgin Islands currently reports 59.3% against 22.7% in IDA blend, a difference of 36.6%.
That makes British Virgin Islands's figure about 2.6 times IDA blend's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, British Virgin Islands has been ahead every year.
British Virgin Islands ranks 9th and IDA blend ranks 11th of 177 countries.
British Virgin Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | British Virgin Islands | IDA blend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.0% | 0.2% | 54.8% | British Virgin Islands |
| 2010s | 72.1% | 15.5% | 56.6% | British Virgin Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, British Virgin Islands or IDA blend?
- British Virgin Islands, at 59.3% against 22.7% in IDA blend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between British Virgin Islands and IDA blend?
- 36.6%, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for British Virgin Islands and IDA blend?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do British Virgin Islands and IDA blend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- British Virgin Islands ranks 9th and IDA blend ranks 11th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.