Benin vs Macau (China): Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Benin
0.0%
in 2019
Macau (China)
0.0%
in 2019
Benin rank
69th
Macau (China) rank
69th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Benin
- Macau (China)
How they compare
Benin currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Macau (China), a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Macau (China) ahead.
Benin ranks 69th and Macau (China) ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Macau (China) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Benin |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Benin or Macau (China)?
- Benin, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Macau (China) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Benin and Macau (China)?
- 0.0%, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Macau (China)?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2019.
- How do Benin and Macau (China) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Benin ranks 69th and Macau (China) ranks 69th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.