Benin vs Luxembourg: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Benin
0.0%
in 2019
Luxembourg
0.0%
in 2018
Benin rank
69th
Luxembourg rank
69th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Benin
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Benin currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Benin ranks 69th and Luxembourg ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.2% | 0.0% | 0.2% | Benin |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Benin or Luxembourg?
- Benin, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Luxembourg as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Benin and Luxembourg?
- 0.0%, with Benin ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Luxembourg?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Benin and Luxembourg rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Benin ranks 69th and Luxembourg ranks 69th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.