Belarus vs Iceland: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Belarus
58.2%
in 2018
Iceland
48.1%
in 2018
Belarus rank
10th
Iceland rank
13th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Belarus
  • Iceland
0204060199920082018

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 58.2% against 48.1% in Iceland, a difference of 10.1%.

That makes Belarus's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 10th and Iceland ranks 13th of 177 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Belarus or Iceland?
Belarus, at 58.2% against 48.1% in Iceland as of 2018.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Belarus and Iceland?
10.1%, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Iceland?
8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2018.
How do Belarus and Iceland rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Belarus ranks 10th and Iceland ranks 13th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
211 places, 3,062 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.