Australia vs Finland: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Australia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 47.1% against 40.7% in Australia, a difference of 6.4%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Finland ahead.
Australia ranks 18th and Finland ranks 15th of 177 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 35.0% | 32.1% | 2.9% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Australia or Finland?
- Finland, at 47.1% against 40.7% in Australia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Australia and Finland?
- 6.4%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Finland rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Australia ranks 18th and Finland ranks 15th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.