Aruba vs Uganda: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Aruba
0.0%
in 2014
Uganda
0.0%
in 2017
Aruba rank
69th
Uganda rank
69th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Aruba
  • Uganda
00.20.40.60.81199820072017

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 69th and Uganda ranks 69th of 177 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Aruba or Uganda?
Aruba, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Uganda as of 2014.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Aruba and Uganda?
0.0%, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Uganda?
15 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2014.
How do Aruba and Uganda rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Aruba ranks 69th and Uganda ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
211 places, 3,062 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.