Aruba vs China: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Aruba
0.0%
in 2014
China
0.0%
in 2019
Aruba rank
69th
China rank
69th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Aruba
  • China
00.20.40.60.81199920092019

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in China, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 14 years both countries report, China has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 69th and China ranks 69th of 177 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba China Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Aruba or China?
Aruba, at 0.0% against 0.0% in China as of 2014.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Aruba and China?
0.0%, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and China?
14 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2014.
How do Aruba and China rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Aruba ranks 69th and China ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
211 places, 3,062 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.