Arab World vs Lithuania: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Arab World
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 28.3% against 1.7% in Arab World, a difference of 26.6%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 16.7 times Arab World's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Lithuania has been ahead every year.
Arab World ranks 32nd and Lithuania ranks 30th of 34 groups.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Arab World | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.1% | 13.0% | 10.9% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 2.7% | 14.1% | 11.3% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 1.0% | 23.4% | 22.4% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Arab World or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 28.3% against 1.7% in Arab World as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Arab World and Lithuania?
- 26.6%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Arab World and Lithuania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Arab World and Lithuania rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Arab World ranks 32nd and Lithuania ranks 30th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.