Portugal vs Pre-demographic dividend: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male over time
- Portugal
- Pre-demographic dividend
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 91.4% against 25.6% in Pre-demographic dividend, a difference of 65.8%.
That makes Portugal's figure about 3.6 times Pre-demographic dividend's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.
Portugal ranks 26th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 26th of 164 countries.
Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | Pre-demographic dividend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.6% | 14.6% | 67.0% | Portugal |
| 2010s | 92.4% | 19.4% | 73.0% | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male, Portugal or Pre-demographic dividend?
- Portugal, at 91.4% against 25.6% in Pre-demographic dividend as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male between Portugal and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 65.8%, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Pre-demographic dividend?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Portugal and Pre-demographic dividend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male?
- Portugal ranks 26th and Pre-demographic dividend ranks 26th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in early childhood education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official early childhood education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.