Low & middle income vs Malaysia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male
Low & middle income
49.7%
in 2019
Malaysia
96.5%
in 2019
Low & middle income rank
15th
Malaysia rank
16th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male over time
- Low & middle income
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 96.5% against 49.7% in Low & middle income, a difference of 46.8%.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.9 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Low & middle income ranks 15th and Malaysia ranks 16th of 34 groups.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low & middle income | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.0% | 63.9% | 31.9% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 44.6% | 91.3% | 46.7% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male, Low & middle income or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 96.5% against 49.7% in Low & middle income as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male between Low & middle income and Malaysia?
- 46.8%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Malaysia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Low & middle income and Malaysia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male?
- Low & middle income ranks 15th and Malaysia ranks 16th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in early childhood education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official early childhood education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.