Liechtenstein vs Low & middle income: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male over time
- Liechtenstein
- Low & middle income
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 100.0% against 49.7% in Low & middle income, a difference of 50.3%.
That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 2.0 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.
Liechtenstein ranks 12th and Low & middle income ranks 15th of 164 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liechtenstein | Low & middle income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 99.2% | 32.0% | 67.2% | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 101.9% | 41.9% | 60.0% | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male, Liechtenstein or Low & middle income?
- Liechtenstein, at 100.0% against 49.7% in Low & middle income as of 2016.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male between Liechtenstein and Low & middle income?
- 50.3%, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liechtenstein and Low & middle income?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Liechtenstein and Low & middle income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male?
- Liechtenstein ranks 12th and Low & middle income ranks 15th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in early childhood education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of official early childhood education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.