Marshall Islands vs Mexico: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes
Marshall Islands
38.2%
in 2016
Mexico
38.0%
in 2018
Marshall Islands rank
114th
Mexico rank
115th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes over time
- Marshall Islands
- Mexico
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports 38.2% against 38.0% in Mexico, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Mexico ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 114th and Mexico ranks 115th of 163 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 63.2% | 73.1% | 9.9% | Mexico |
| 2000s | 51.1% | 97.1% | 46.0% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 40.6% | 59.3% | 18.7% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes, Marshall Islands or Mexico?
- Marshall Islands, at 38.2% against 38.0% in Mexico as of 2016.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes between Marshall Islands and Mexico?
- 0.2%, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Mexico?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2016.
- How do Marshall Islands and Mexico rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes?
- Marshall Islands ranks 114th and Mexico ranks 115th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official early childhood education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.