IBRD only vs Liechtenstein: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes
IBRD only
58.7%
in 2019
Liechtenstein
102.6%
in 2016
IBRD only rank
10th
Liechtenstein rank
10th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes over time
- IBRD only
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 102.6% against 58.7% in IBRD only, a difference of 43.9%.
That makes Liechtenstein's figure about 1.7 times IBRD only's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 10th and Liechtenstein ranks 10th of 34 groups.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.5% | 98.0% | 56.5% | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 51.1% | 101.7% | 50.6% | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes, IBRD only or Liechtenstein?
- Liechtenstein, at 102.6% against 58.7% in IBRD only as of 2016.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes between IBRD only and Liechtenstein?
- 43.9%, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Liechtenstein?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do IBRD only and Liechtenstein rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes?
- IBRD only ranks 10th and Liechtenstein ranks 10th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official early childhood education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.