Cuba vs IDA blend: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes
Cuba
94.0%
in 2019
IDA blend
45.3%
in 2016
Cuba rank
19th
IDA blend rank
20th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes over time
- Cuba
- IDA blend
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 94.0% against 45.3% in IDA blend, a difference of 48.7%.
That makes Cuba's figure about 2.1 times IDA blend's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 19th and IDA blend ranks 20th of 163 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | IDA blend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.4% | 22.0% | 73.4% | Cuba |
| 2010s | 92.6% | 33.1% | 59.6% | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes, Cuba or IDA blend?
- Cuba, at 94.0% against 45.3% in IDA blend as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes between Cuba and IDA blend?
- 48.7%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and IDA blend?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Cuba and IDA blend rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes?
- Cuba ranks 19th and IDA blend ranks 20th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official early childhood education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.