Bhutan vs Costa Rica: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes
Bhutan
32.7%
in 2020
Costa Rica
34.5%
in 2019
Bhutan rank
124th
Costa Rica rank
121st
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes over time
- Bhutan
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 34.5% against 32.7% in Bhutan, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Bhutan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Bhutan ranks 124th and Costa Rica ranks 121st of 163 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9% | 16.6% | 15.7% | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 1.3% | 24.1% | 22.8% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 18.4% | 28.6% | 10.3% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes, Bhutan or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 34.5% against 32.7% in Bhutan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes between Bhutan and Costa Rica?
- 1.8%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Costa Rica?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Bhutan and Costa Rica rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes?
- Bhutan ranks 124th and Costa Rica ranks 121st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official early childhood education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.