Bangladesh vs Tunisia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes
Bangladesh
40.8%
in 2018
Tunisia
44.6%
in 2016
Bangladesh rank
104th
Tunisia rank
101st
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes over time
- Bangladesh
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 44.6% against 40.8% in Bangladesh, a difference of 3.8%.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 104th and Tunisia ranks 101st of 163 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.0% | 14.1% | 5.0% | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 16.4% | 17.8% | 1.3% | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 33.6% | 43.2% | 9.6% | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes, Bangladesh or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 44.6% against 40.8% in Bangladesh as of 2016.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes between Bangladesh and Tunisia?
- 3.8%, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Tunisia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2016.
- How do Bangladesh and Tunisia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes?
- Bangladesh ranks 104th and Tunisia ranks 101st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of official early childhood education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.