Philippines vs Slovenia: Government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant PPP$ over time
- Philippines
- Slovenia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 825.64 millions against 694.75 millions in Slovenia, a difference of 130.89 millions.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.2 times Slovenia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 45th and Slovenia ranks 47th of 95 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant ppp$, Philippines or Slovenia?
- Philippines, at 825.64 millions against 694.75 millions in Slovenia as of 2009.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant ppp$ between Philippines and Slovenia?
- 130.89 millions, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Slovenia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2009.
- How do Philippines and Slovenia rank globally for government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant ppp$?
- Philippines ranks 45th and Slovenia ranks 47th of 95 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on upper secondary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/