Croatia vs Oman: Government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant PPP$ over time
- Croatia
- Oman
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 946.82 millions against 717.81 millions in Oman, a difference of 229.01 millions.
That makes Croatia's figure about 1.3 times Oman's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 43rd and Oman ranks 46th of 95 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 785.76 millions | 644.53 millions | 141.24 millions | Croatia |
| 2010s | 951.14 millions | 1,132 millions | 180.37 millions | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant ppp$, Croatia or Oman?
- Croatia, at 946.82 millions against 717.81 millions in Oman as of 2017.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant ppp$ between Croatia and Oman?
- 229.01 millions, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Oman?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Croatia and Oman rank globally for government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant ppp$?
- Croatia ranks 43rd and Oman ranks 46th of 95 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on upper secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on upper secondary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/