Chile vs Hong Kong: Government expenditure on tertiary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on tertiary education, constant PPP$ over time
- Chile
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Chile currently reports 5,981 millions against 5,951 millions in Hong Kong, a difference of 30 millions.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Chile ranks 36th and Hong Kong ranks 37th of 144 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 923.16 millions | 2,287 millions | 1,364 millions | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 1,639 millions | 3,925 millions | 2,286 millions | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 4,630 millions | 4,071 millions | 559.06 millions | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on tertiary education, constant ppp$, Chile or Hong Kong?
- Chile, at 5,981 millions against 5,951 millions in Hong Kong as of 2017.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on tertiary education, constant ppp$ between Chile and Hong Kong?
- 30 millions, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Hong Kong?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2017.
- How do Chile and Hong Kong rank globally for government expenditure on tertiary education, constant ppp$?
- Chile ranks 36th and Hong Kong ranks 37th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on tertiary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on tertiary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/