New Zealand vs Slovakia: Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ over time
- New Zealand
- Slovakia
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 2,153 millions against 1,503 millions in Slovakia, a difference of 650 millions.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Slovakia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 34th and Slovakia ranks 37th of 92 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$, New Zealand or Slovakia?
- New Zealand, at 2,153 millions against 1,503 millions in Slovakia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$ between New Zealand and Slovakia?
- 650 millions, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovakia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2017.
- How do New Zealand and Slovakia rank globally for government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$?
- New Zealand ranks 34th and Slovakia ranks 37th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on lower secondary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/