Ireland vs New Zealand: Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ over time
- Ireland
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 2,153 millions against 1,798 millions in Ireland, a difference of 355 millions.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.2 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 36th and New Zealand ranks 34th of 92 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$, Ireland or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 2,153 millions against 1,798 millions in Ireland as of 2017.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$ between Ireland and New Zealand?
- 355 millions, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and New Zealand?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2017.
- How do Ireland and New Zealand rank globally for government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$?
- Ireland ranks 36th and New Zealand ranks 34th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on lower secondary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/