Iceland vs Malawi: Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ over time
- Iceland
- Malawi
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 195.16 millions against 175.75 millions in Malawi, a difference of 19.41 millions.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 70th and Malawi ranks 71st of 92 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$, Iceland or Malawi?
- Iceland, at 195.16 millions against 175.75 millions in Malawi as of 2017.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$ between Iceland and Malawi?
- 19.41 millions, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malawi?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2016.
- How do Iceland and Malawi rank globally for government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$?
- Iceland ranks 70th and Malawi ranks 71st of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on lower secondary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/