Ethiopia vs Lithuania: Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ over time
- Ethiopia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 970.03 millions against 969.23 millions in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.8 millions.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Lithuania ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 44th and Lithuania ranks 43rd of 92 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 548.9 millions | 1,482 millions | 933.14 millions | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 822.82 millions | 1,050 millions | 227.14 millions | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$, Ethiopia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 970.03 millions against 969.23 millions in Ethiopia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$ between Ethiopia and Lithuania?
- 0.8 millions, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Lithuania?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2015.
- How do Ethiopia and Lithuania rank globally for government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$?
- Ethiopia ranks 44th and Lithuania ranks 43rd of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on lower secondary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/