Czechia vs Philippines: Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$
Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ over time
- Czechia
- Philippines
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 3,764 millions against 3,079 millions in Philippines, a difference of 685 millions.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 25th and Philippines ranks 28th of 92 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$, Czechia or Philippines?
- Czechia, at 3,764 millions against 3,079 millions in Philippines as of 2017.
- What is the difference in government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$ between Czechia and Philippines?
- 685 millions, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Philippines?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Czechia and Philippines rank globally for government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant ppp$?
- Czechia ranks 25th and Philippines ranks 28th of 92 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Government expenditure on lower secondary education, constant PPP$ (millions). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total general (local, regional and central) government expenditure on lower secondary education (current, capital, and transfers), in millions PPP$ (at purchasing power parity) in constant value (taking into account inflation). It includes expenditure funded by transfers from international sources to government. Total government expenditure for a given level of education (e.g. primary, secondary, or all levels combined) in national currency is converted to PPP$, and where it is expressed in constant value, uses a GDP deflator to account for inflation. The constant prices base year is normally three years before the year of the data release. For example, in the July 2017 data release, constant PPP$ values are expressed in 2014 prices. Limitations: In some instances data on total government expenditure on education refers only to the Ministry of Education, excluding other ministries which may also spend a part of their budget on educational activities. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute of Statistics website: http://www.uis.unesco.org/Education/